I saw at a conference in Nantes on nanotechnology, one of the facilitators (Jean-Claude Vitran, Member of the National Bureau, in charge of the group "Liberty and News Technologies "of the League of Human Rights)" shake "the ballot as a means of expressing people deal with political candidates. But what is it exactly?
These take power ... and then decide for them! Is that indirect democracy, indeed!
Direct democracy is it not possible?
I do not know, but with our democracy system, citizens are often the "least worst choice"
!!!!! Do they get satisfaction? It seems not. Once elected, they do what they want ...
People leave and do not go running look no further, yet the elected officials should, where disagreement with the people they can be replaced without waiting for the next election. We saw what happened when the pension reform: people in the call (or not) trade unions have expressed for several weeks, and then it may well be also in the call still unions they stopped to manifest! And all this for what?
What our democracy has served the people in this case?
So what is that supposed to mean?? We see it with the proposed airport at Notre Dame des Landes, agreements between the PS and "environmentalists" Are they beneficial in the end? I wonder ...
The destruction of nature at Notre Dame des Landes as elsewhere is desired because it is the opposite of what cities and towns provide. Far from the stresses of the consumer society, the individual finds other entertainment, often free! The alienation of the individual in all sorts of spending ever more expensive, makes forced to work ever more and ever more quickly to meet competition, to the point of no longer think and lose any sense of revulsion system, yet he knows bad for him and his fellow !!
Many are caught up in and dream of more freedom, but every day it seems that decisions are beyond them away a bit more!
The revolution of 1789 is far from having erased all the injustices of the past, the elites are doing everything to protect their privileges. The kings became presidents, lords, MPs ...
Liberty, equality and fraternity, which reality and for how long? When we hear "it's every man for himself"!
You tell me, the great beast has always eaten the small, in all cases, this is what we first to our mind, but this is not always the case! Dinosaurs may also fall to the ground.
fraternity where is it when people suggest that one day here, as in America, you must be rich to care!
Social security would be endangered, but what's all this about? Can you let that happen and not react?
It will someday, the sleep of the people (the Democrats like to call the sovereign people), this tendency to fade from his consciousness is reversed, otherwise it will not live here.
I traveled more once the site of Sylvain Timsit, http://www.syti.net ... some might, especially young people (it is their future in question, right?), Find sources of inspiration for future change that are imposed at all in the name of a new God that called "Globalization ..." !
Chapter Reinventing Democracy "is particularly interesting.
"... citizens have no control over government policy between elections ..."
0 comments:
Post a Comment