I noted recently on the site http://www.terra-economica.info the following words of Jean-Marc Ayrault, the following question: Terra eco: Specifically, how are you going to do with local environmentalists, while remaining issues of contention as strong as the proposed airport at Notre Dame-des-Landes in the Loire-Atlantique, for example? "
"Jean-Marc Ayrault:" First, we disagree with environmentalists on this inter-regional airport is not new. He had already spoken to the last regional elections in 2004. And I notice that environmentalists themselves have their own contradictions on this subject since the UBD (Union of Democratic Breton), presents the list of Europe Ecology Pays de la Loire, supports this airport. That said, an alliance between the PS and environmentalists for the second round does not mean that everyone disappears in a weak consensus. With the Greens and Jean-Philippe Magnen, my assistant [2], we had found common ground in 2008: draft that we submitted to voters in municipal elections was "to support the decision of the State build the airport at Notre-Dame-des-Landes to ensuring social harmony, economic and environmental local . While it is true, this issue weighed politically, especially in the territories and municipalities directly impacted by this future equipment, which I understand. But on the whole region, as elsewhere, there are many more projects that unite us than issues that divide us, such as giving priority to rail, to remain in the field of transport. That's what voters should keep in mind next Sunday: the socialists and ecologists, for 6 years, most often ruled regions together, and it will continue to agree on the essentials. "
The airport project is however not a small issue and upset the balance social-economic and environmental area if pursued to its completion. Is not it called "structuring" by politicians of Rennes and Nantes?
What does the following sentence, "the Greens and Jean-Philippe Magnen, my assistant, we had found common ground in 2008: the draft that we submitted to voters in municipal elections was" to accompany the State's decision to build the airport at Notre-Dame-des-Landes to ensuring social harmony, economic and environmental local "??
The divergence between Europe Ecology and PS on the subject of the airport project is to what extent? The verb "to accompany " chosen by Jean-Marc Ayrault mean he agreed that Europe Ecology his achievement or is it the reporter rephrased the sentence? It's enough to wonder.
Yet there is no doubt that politicians in Europe Ecology as Genevieve Lebouteux oppose this, then what should we think of the statement by Jean-Marc Ayrault on the site of "terra -economica? What should we think of the agreement between Ecology Europe and the PS on the subject of the airport project? Without doubt he allowed to have more an elected official (s) in Europe Ecology regional council, but at what price?
Anyway, opposition to this project is a matter of common sense, and it is not conceivable to deliver any such bulldozers. Elected officials who doubt the project are more than 580 today, how will they be tomorrow?
Currently nothing is destroyed on the spot, it's not too late to stop the project. The French state owns less than half the planned area for the project! This would mean expropriate and expel the residents from their homes, this is simply inamissible!
When will it be decided to abandon this project? Who will decide? Why the eagerness to want to vandalize the nature and agricultural land while at the same time a complete program agenda M6 ( Capital Earth) on the subject next Wednesday at 20:40 by Guy Lagache?
0 comments:
Post a Comment