The photo shows the results on the evening of the first round of regional elections of 2010 at Notre Dame des Landes. For the entire region of Pays de la Loire, Europe Ecology is more than 10% (13.5% approximately), Ecology Europe is therefore not obliged to merge with the PS (which is slightly more than 34%, better than the UMP, which is almost 33%) and could very well maintain itself and merge with the other list opposite the airport project of Our Lady of the moors, the list "Left Front, Zip, Alternative, PCF led by Marc Gicquel, who got 5%, in contrast to the modem.
Now we have received confirmation this evening, on the plateau de France 3, as Europe Ecology merge first with the PS, and the list of Marc Gicquel join them then, why this choice? The priority of Ecology Europe is first to win against the UMP (which I understand happy), but how about the difference of the airport project will she treated? Is this how it will be more elected (s) against the proposed airport at Notre Dame heathlands in the region? Perhaps, but it's not as obvious as that, because the second round rule is: the leading list is automatically awarded 25% of seats to regional council, the remaining 75% are distributed according to the rule of proportional between these lists in the second round. What is clear is that the formula chosen, will elect the first Socialist Party candidate in favor of the project Our airport of the Landes, the more will come later, if they arrive ...
With this formula, voters opposed the airport project of Our Lady of the moors are forced to give their votes to candidates of the Socialist Party, which for the most part are friendly, so they should ignore this difference and hope that the alliance between these three lists will be helpful to the fight against the project. Sorry, but I can not , do not ask the impossible! I will not give my vote to people who support this ecological disaster, economic and social development is out of question! The election is over for me tonight and whatever the consequences! I am sorry but I can not do otherwise.
It seems to me that the next appointment with the ballot box in 2012? The fight against the airport project of the Great West is not complete, it will continue with or without the politicians, we obviously can not rely on them for this project to be abandoned! Other actors in the economy should have the courage to stand on this issue and take action to avoid the worst! I think in particular of small and large businesses that have more to lose than to gain priority, all those who want to get into the real development sustainable!
In France, less than half the country voted for this first round of regional elections, the national estimate of the abstention rate was 53%, which clearly means that if politicians were elected with such a rate abstention, they would be using less than half the citizens! And despite such a lack of representativeness of public opinion, these same politicians decide our future by voting for such laws ... In short, it's good to go vote, but who to trust? Without doubt, this is THE question that many people, especially when they see the difference that are among those who handle money including traders, bankers (supported by the policies) and those who create wealth through their labor whose jobs are often outsourced.
The disclaimers at the national and even regional voter concerns me for the modem, it would seem impossible to leave the dual PS / UMP.
Note that this is not the case for the municipality of Notre Dame des Landes, where the opposition asserted by Patricia Gallerneau airport project of the Great West said of Notre Dame des Landes allowed him to come in second position, I am very sad that this result has not been the same regional level we could be longer in this election, the environmental issue, economic and social benefits of this airport project.
0 comments:
Post a Comment